Paste a public URL and we will crawl a sample of pages to score Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trust using on-page patterns (content depth, authorship, Organization schema, citations, contact/legal pages, and more). This is an educational heuristic—not a Google ranking verdict. For crawl files, metadata, and full technical coverage, also run our free LLM & technical SEO audit and read how discovery works in ChatGPT-style surfaces.
Grade —
E-E-A-T is shorthand for Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trust. Google’s public Search Quality Rater Guidelines describe these qualities to help human raters judge whether pages are genuinely useful and reliable—especially when inaccurate information could hurt people or money (often called YMYL: “your money, your life”). Rater feedback does not move a single URL up or down directly, but the concepts align with what Google says it wants in search results: accurate, people-first content from accountable sources.
An extra “E” for Experience (first-hand use of a product, place, or situation) was emphasized in recent guideline updates: it is not enough to summarize a topic; readers and AI systems increasingly reward content that shows real involvement.
Person JSON-LD, Article/BlogPosting markup, and whether an About or team-style URL appears in the crawl or sitemap.Organization or LocalBusiness entities, breadcrumbs, outbound links to recognized reference domains, and internal linking strength between related pages.Strong trust signals help both classic blue-link SEO and newer answer engines: search systems want to surface publishers they can justify to users, and LLM-based tools increasingly cite sources with clear entities, stable URLs, and explicit authors. Thin pages, missing accountability (no About/Contact), and unsupported claims are risk factors in either channel.
Operationalizing E-E-A-T usually blends editorial work (bios, sourcing, disclosure) with technical SEO (schema, canonicals, consistent site architecture). Our GA4 + Search Console assistant helps prioritize what Google already reports about your visibility while you improve those qualitative signals.
Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trust. Together they describe who created content, whether they have relevant credentials, whether the site is a recognized authority, and whether users can safely rely on policies and contact information.
No. This tool summarizes crawlable signals only. Google does not publish an public “E-E-A-T score,” and our output should not be interpreted as AdWords, Search Console, or ranking feedback from Google.
There are no guarantees in SEO. Improving E-E-A-T-aligned signals reduces friction for both users and algorithms, but competition, technical health, and query intent still dominate outcomes.
Yes, but automated scans cannot evaluate medical or legal accuracy. Pair automated checks with professional review of your claims, citations, and disclosures—especially on YMYL topics.